Friday, December 23, 2016

Omit Needless Words - The Writing Exercise



This post will delve into the practical application of what we discussed in a previous blog post: Omit Needless Words.

You can use the following content as a practical, writing exercise. This is an opportunity to practice omitting needless words. For most people, actively using a concept is a better way to learn than passively reading or listening. Active use helps to solidify the concept you are trying to master.

Attendings will certainly benefit from this exercise. However, this exercise will also be good for residents, medical students, PA students, NP students, and scribes. So please pass it on.

Below you will find a fictional history and physical exam.

My recommended instructions are:
1.       Copy and paste the chart onto the format of your choice
2.       Omit the needless words
3.       Compare to the “answer” at the end.

There will be more than one way to omit needless words, so your answers may be a little bit different than mine. The important concept to remember is that cutting out unnecessary words makes your chart easier to understand.

Feel free to re-arrange some of the sentences a little bit.

Our sample chart:

History of Presenting Illness:
The patient is a 31 year old male without past medical history who complains of dizziness and palpitations. Symptoms started about 30 minutes before presentation to the ER.  Associated symptoms include tremors, anxiety, and nausea.

He works as a janitor in our hospital. Symptoms started towards the end of the night shift. He slept less than normal before his shift. Tells me he had 3 caffeinated energy drinks throughout the shift.

No similar symptoms in the past. No drug use. Denied chest pain, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or headache. Feels dizziness, tremors, and nausea resolved. Now feels generalized fatigue.

Review of Systems:
General: Fatigue. No fever.
HEENT: No sore throat. No runny nose.
Card: Palpitations. No chest pain. No leg swelling.
Resp: No shortness of breath. No cough.
Abd: Nausea. No vomiting. No diarrhea.
GU: No dysuria.
MuscSkel: No myalgias.
Neuro: Dizziness. Tremors. No headache.

Past Medical History:
None

Past Surgical History:
None

Social history:
No drug use.
Employed as hospital janitor.

Physical Exam:
Vital signs: BP = 110/65, HR = 92, RR = 18, T=37 C
General: Comfortable.
HEENT: Moist mucous membranes. Clear pharynx.
Card: Regular rate and rhythm. No murmur.
Resp: No accessory muscle use. Clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Abd: Normal bowel sounds. Soft. Nontender. No Masses.
GU: No costovertebral angle tenderness.
Skin: No jaundice. No rash.
MuscSkel: Full range of motion in all 4 extremities.
Neuro: Cranial nerves 2-12 intact. 5/5 strength in all 4 extremities. No tremors. Normal gait.
Psych: No pressured speech. Calm. Cooperative. Good historian. Clear speech.

Assessment and Plan:
The patient’s clinical picture fits fatigue and effects of stimulant use. Unlikely acute coronary syndrome due to lack of chest pain, lack of shortness of breath, and lack of illicit drug use. Currently with normal neurological exam, so serious, lasting CNS side effects seem unlikely. Clinical exam and history are not consistent with electrolyte abnormality. Exam is also not consistent with lasting effects of stimulants given normal vital signs and lack of tremors.

Will obtain EKG go assess for underlying arrhythmia. Will discharge home if EKG does not show signs of serious pathology.






Achieving the “Answer”

I’ve highlighted the bits of data that are redundant, those parts with needless words. These will be the areas I’ll focus on when I omit the needless words.

History of Presenting Illness:
The patient is a 31 year old male without past medical history who complains of dizziness and palpitations. Symptoms started about 30 minutes before presentation to the ER.  Associated symptoms include tremors, anxiety, and nausea.

He works as a janitor in our hospital. Symptoms started towards the end of the night shift. He slept less than normal before his shift. Tells me he had 3 caffeinated energy drinks throughout the shift.

No similar symptoms in the past. No drug use. Denied chest pain, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or headache. Feels dizziness, tremors, and nausea resolved. Now feels generalized fatigue.

Review of Systems:
General: Fatigue. No fever.
HEENT: No sore throat. No runny nose.
Card: Palpitations. No chest pain. No leg swelling.
Resp: No shortness of breath. No cough.
Abd: Nausea. No vomiting. No diarrhea.
GU: No dysuria.
MuscSkel: No myalgias.
Neuro: Dizziness. Tremors. No headache.

Past Medical History:
None

Past Surgical History:
None

Social history:
No drug use.
Employed as hospital janitor.

Physical Exam:
Vital signs: BP = 110/65, HR = 92, RR = 18, T=37 C
General: Comfortable.
HEENT: Moist mucous membranes. Clear pharynx.
Card: Regular rate and rhythm. No murmur.
Resp: No accessory muscle use. Clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Abd: Normal bowel sounds. Soft. Nontender. No Masses.
GU: No costovertebral angle tenderness.
Skin: No jaundice. No rash.
MuscSkel: Full range of motion in all 4 extremities.
Neuro: Cranial nerves 2-12 intact. 5/5 strength in all 4 extremities. No tremors. Normal gait.
Psych: No pressured speech. Calm. Cooperative. Good historian. Clear speech.

Assessment and Plan:
The patient’s clinical picture fits fatigue and effects of stimulant use. Unlikely acute coronary syndrome due to lack of chest pain, lack of shortness of breath, and lack of illicit drug use. Currently with normal neurological exam, so serious, lasing CNS side effects seem unlikely. Clinical exam and history are not consistent with electrolyte abnormality. Exam is also not consistent with lasting effects of stimulants given normal vital signs and lack of tremors.

Will obtain EKG go assess for underlying arrhythmia. Will discharge home if EKG does not show signs of serious pathology.



“The Answer”
In the HPI, I tried to focus on the pertinent positives. I left most of the negatives for the ROS.

In the A/P, I cut out the parts that repeated data from earlier in the chart. I left the prose to just state the conclusions.


History of Presenting Illness:
The patient is a 31 year old male who complains of dizziness and palpitations. Symptoms started about 30 minutes before presentation to the ER.  Associated symptoms include tremors, anxiety, and nausea. Symptoms resolved.

He works as a janitor in our hospital. Symptoms started towards the end of the night shift. He slept less than normal before his shift. Tells me he had 3 caffeinated energy drinks throughout the shift.

No similar symptoms in the past. No drug use. Now feels generalized fatigue.

Review of Systems:
General: No fever.
HEENT: No sore throat. No runny nose.
Card: No chest pain. No leg swelling.
Resp: No shortness of breath. No cough.
Abd: No vomiting. No diarrhea.
GU: No dysuria.
MuscSkel: No myalgias.
Neuro: No headache.

Past Medical History:
None

Past Surgical History:
None

Social history:
See History of Presenting Illness

Physical Exam:
General: Comfortable.
HEENT: Moist mucous membranes. Clear pharynx.
Card: Regular rate and rhythm. No murmur.
Resp: No accessory muscle use. Clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Abd: Normal bowel sounds. Soft. Nontender. No Masses.
GU: No costovertebral angle tenderness.
Skin: No jaundice. No rash.
MuscSkel: Full range of motion in all 4 extremities.
Neuro: Cranial nerves 2-12 intact. 5/5 strength in all 4 extremities. No tremors. Normal gait.
Psych: No pressured speech. Calm. Cooperative. Good historian. Clear speech.

Assessment and Plan:
The patient’s clinical picture fits fatigue and effects of stimulant use. Unlikely acute coronary syndrome, serious lasting CNS side effects, electrolyte abnormality or lasting effects of stimulants.

Will obtain EKG go assess for underlying arrhythmia. Will discharge home if EKG does not show signs of serious pathology.



To learn more about medical charting for clarity and medico-legal defensibility, please check out my book: The Handbook of Medical Charting. It discusses the concept of omitting needless words and more.

Monday, November 28, 2016

Please Correlate Clinically



Clinicians hate this phrase in a radiology report. I’ve heard fellow clinicians say “this means nothing” or “radiology doesn’t want to take any responsibility” or “that can mean anything”.

I used to be like that. But since I’ve had the opportunity to delve deeper into clinical decision making, I’ve changed my mind.

What this dreaded phrase means is that the radiology findings can mean different things under different circumstances. Radiology is not giving us the answer, radiology is giving us another piece of the puzzle. We as clinicians still have to put the pieces of that puzzle together. We have to see how this new data fits into the big picture, and try to make the oftentimes scattered data into a cohesive picture of useful information.

Let’s use an example that uses the exact same concept, but without the words “Please correlate clinically” attached. You order a CBC and the white blood cell count result returns at16,000. We know 16,000 is above normal and that’s about it from this single data point. We as clinicians have to put this data into a clinical context to give us some useful information.

Can this mean the patient is acutely sick?
If a patient chronically has this white blood cell count, then no.

Can it mean the patient is getting worse?
If the patient had a white blood cell count of 13,000 yesterday, then it indicates that the patient is getting worse.

Can it mean the patient is getting better?
If the white blood cell count yesterday was 22,000, the it indicates the patient is getting better.

Does it mean the patient has a serious infection?
If the patient has no symptoms of infection and has been on corticosteroids for an asthma attack for 3 days, then it points away from infection.

The same data can have different meanings depending on context.

Most clinicians won’t get frustrated and say “why didn’t the lab just tell me what the patient has?”. We’ll take the white blood cell count of 16,000, put it in it place in the clinical context, take a step back, and use that information to help figure out what’s going on with our patient. Basically, we correlate clinically and it’s no big deal.

A radiology reading gives us data just the same as the white blood cell count. We should treat it just the same. We should put all pieces of data about our patient together into the puzzle that is our patient. Our job as clinicians is to put those pieces together in a sensible, cohesive way to achieve our diagnosis.

Let’s see a couple radiology examples:

We have a chest x-ray with an ill defined, left lower lobe opacity. Radiology tells us, “Please correlate clinically”.

In one scenario, the patient has 3 days of fever, worsening productive cough, pleuritic chest pain, and a white blood cell count of 14. Sounds like the patient’s got pneumonia.

In another scenario, the patient has 3 months of weight loss, generalized weakness, and a scant, productive cough that is occasionally tinged with a small amount of blood. Here it Sounds like the patient’s got cancer.

Let’s see yet another example:

The patient had a CT of the abdomen. The small intestine shows an area of bowel wall thickening that could be consistent with inflammatory bowel or poor distension due to incomplete filling with oral contrast. Radiology tell us, “Correlate clinically”.

In one scenario, the patient has a week of worsening diarrhea, nausea, low grade fever, diffuse abdominal tenderness on repeat exams, and a white blood cell count of 15. Sounds like inflammatory bowel disease.

In another scenario, the patient has vomiting and diarrhea that started yesterday resolved just prior to arrival to the ER, has decreasing tenderness on repeat examinations despite only receiving fluids, feels hungry, and has a normal WBC. Sounds more like incomplete filling.

The take home message here is that “correlate clinically” just means you should put the pieces of the puzzle into place, and make the decision on the patient’s diagnosis as a clinician. Most of the time, you should be making the diagnosis, not the radiologist. The radiologist is there to help you make the decision, with one piece of the picture… not the whole picture. Sometimes radiology’s piece of the picture will be bigger, sometimes it will be smaller, but it will rarely be the whole puzzle.

So the next time the radiologist writes, “Please correlate clinically”, take this as a gentle reminder that you’re the one putting the puzzle together.

If you’re interested in learning more about clinical decision making (either a student, resident, faculty, or lifelong intern), please keep an eye out for my upcoming book tentatively titled A Guide To Making Clinical Decisions.

You may also be interested in my book on medical charting for clarity and medicolegal defensibility: The Handbook of Medical Charting